There’s a lot of text being generated about a post by a nice
man whom I’ve spoken to once or twice called John Warbuton who had a bad
experience making a pilot of a pub-based comedy called Inn Mates for BBC3. It was so bad, he left television altogether. I
have some sympathy with his frustration. I remember watching the show when it
was broadcast and it didn’t quite hang together. And given the show had
departed from John’s original creative vision, it must have been frustrating
than he didn’t get to make the show he set out to make.
This has whipped up an anti-executive feeling
among some writers, resulting in some big guns like Graham Linehan, Sam Bain
and James Corden going in to bat for the execs – although no one is pretending
all execs everywhere are fonts of script wisdom and good notes. There is a summary of all the above here.
Pic by Recovering Vagabond via Flick |
Is TV Comedy Top Heavy?
My first contact with the BBC as a writer was in about 1998
and in the last 15 years, I’ve met quite a lot of Producers, Executive
Producers, Development Producers, Script Editors, Heads of Comedy, Creative
Heads of Comedy and Commissioning Executives. Is TV Comedy top heavy? Given
that none of those job titles I’ve just mentioned are made up, probably. But
let’s put things into perspective.
Some politicians are nice, some
tactless, annoying or in the job for the wrong reasons. And none of these attributes dictate how effective that politician is. And it’s the same in NHS, MOD,
BP, BBC, BA, Honda, Channel 4, Paperchase, The National Trust and Sky.
Some TV Comedy executives are just plain bad at their job.
That’s okay. There are plenty of terrible writers too. Some TV Comedy
executives are bad at parts of their job and good at the bits you don’t see. Or
they’re good at the script bit, but they didn’t get your show commissioned
because they weren’t pushy enough with the Channel Controller who probably
would have given in if they’d pestered for long enough.
It's Complicated
There is more to being a TV executive than giving notes. Why?
Because TV companies have shareholders and need to make money. Because BBC gets
a licence fee it has to justify and is crucified by a sneering press every time
it’s deemed to put a foot wrong. And if they’re going to make 6 x 30mins
episode of your show, they’re going to be spending at least £1.5million on
making your jokes appear on the telly. That’s a lot of money. You’re going to
get notes. And questions. And last minute idiotic flights of creative fancy
from tired, scared people who don’t know when to keep their mouths shut. It's how the business works. It's how business works.
All of the above means that I’m not surprised that in the last 15
years, I’ve had perfectly good shows turned down for bad reasons. I’ve written sitcom pilots that were aimed at the wrong channel. I wrote a pilot script for BBC3 a few
years ago for an initiative that was specifically designed to find hits that
could crossover to BBC1. And was told my script had been turned down because it
felt ‘too BBC1’. It happens. I’ve received notes that I knew at the time were
wrong, but I acted on them and made the script worse. I’ve had scripts
commissioned or ideas optioned that probably weren’t a very good idea in the
first place. I’ve had decent shows that I’ve loved vanish into thin air because
a key person has left the corporation or company (I had one of these last year. It was annoying and painful)
and their replacement had no discernible interest in me, my work or that idea.
I’ve had good experiences of executives – some who worked at
the BBC and some at indies. At BBC Comedy, I’m having a very good experience
with Bluestone 42. A key executive early on liked the basic idea and let us get
on with it – and then backed our vision once we had a script. I’ve had some
good experiences at indies, like Big Bear Films, writing for My Hero for BBC1. And by 'good experience', I mean that I got notes on every draft of my script from
Jamie Rix, who’d also collated notes from Paul Mayhew Archer (Writer, Vicar of
Dibley), Paul Mendelson (Creator, May to December), John Stroud (Producer, Game
On), Marcus Mortimer (Director, Alexi Sayle’s Stuff). That was a lot of notes. From
people who know a bit about comedy. Even so, some of their notes were still wrong and my
job was to weigh up which. So I repeat, if you want to be a screenwriter, get
used to getting notes.
Ultimately, you’re the writer. You’re name is at the front of the show.
You don’t have to change stuff if you don’t want to. But if you’re just
starting out, it’s hard to be 100% certain of your creative vision – and you’re
better off listening to advice. Likewise, if you're older and experience, you might be quite bad at listening to good advice. If you really don’t want to make a change,
that’s fine. But if you dig your heels in and it fails – which is likely, even
if you know what you’re doing – you only have yourself to blame. And that can
be even more painful.
And on the other hand, there are some things that comedy execs do that are really annoying. Here are the 7 Deadly Sins of Giving Notes to a Comedy Writer.
And on the other hand, there are some things that comedy execs do that are really annoying. Here are the 7 Deadly Sins of Giving Notes to a Comedy Writer.
Another typo 3rd-to-last para, last line - you mean 'no discernible interest'
ReplyDeleteThanks, mate. Fixed.
ReplyDeleteOk, there are too many layers of commissioning editors and producers, especially at the BBC. What's worse, some of them suffer from a fear of failure which leads to lots of second guessing and unnecessary tinkering, that's is death to a project. If you get caught up in that it's disheartening BUT not all execs are like that. I've had the good fortune to work with people like Humphrey Barclay, Geoffrey Perkins and Paul Mayhew Archer. Their inspiration, insight and faith made work a joy. Maybe it's a case of keeping going till you find the exec who believes in you.
ReplyDelete